Welcome to Math at The Potter's School 2008-2009

Welcome to an information page about math classes offered at Potter's School. On this page you will find out many different things about math tutorials offered at the school. We can encourage students, explain techniques to solve problems and tie loose ends together in the textbook. We provide assistance with daily work through email. We correct tests. We just can't make the student do the work. That is the Principal's (parent's) job. We desire to work together with you to help your son/daughter's math experience be the best that it can be. Our program utilizes the curriculum developed by the University of Chicago.  (UCSMP)  You can find out more about this program:  UCSMP and at the bottom of the webpage.

SUCCESS

At Potter's School we are strongly committed to placing students to ensure success. After that placement comes the commitment of the student, parent and teacher working together to achieve success. As the principal of the home school it is the parents’ responsibility to follow the student's progress and help the student manage their time wisely to meet their course schedule.

Commitment of the Student: The student will be expected to keep up with the daily work. The student will ask questions and let the teacher and/or parent know when help is needed.

Commitment of the Parent: The parent should be available to supervise and encourage. They will also be required to proctor tests. The parent corrects daily work and decides how to average those together with the test average. The parent is the Principal of the home school.

Commitment of the Teacher: In addition to a 90 minute, once a week lecture, the teacher will provide a calendar of assignments which will be updated monthly. The teacher will provide tests and additional worksheets when necessary. The teacher will answer email daily and will strive to have less then a 48 hour turn around time on returning corrected tests.

OVERVIEW

1) Class meets 90 minutes once a week.

2) Maximum of 15 students per class.

3) Lessons for the next five days are discussed during the 90 minute class session. The instructor uses a microphone and a digital whiteboard to diagram problems as well as explain lessons from the textbook. The students interact with the teacher and other students via audio and chat box.

4) Daily homework assignments are posted on a calendar at a website. Students generally spend at least 1 hour for Transition Math and Algebra and 1 1/2 hours for Geometry, Advanced Algebra, FST, Pre-Calculus, and Calculus each day. Either the parent or student (supervised by the parent) corrects the homework using a solution manual. We do have assignments scheduled on the day of class.

5) All tests are downloaded in a pdf file format, printed and taken by the student. The parent proctors and snail mails the test to the instructor including a self-addressed stamped envelope. The instructor corrects and returns the test. We strive to have a 48 hour turn around time.

6) The instructor provides you with a grade for the course based solely on test averages. It is then up to the Principal of your home school (the parent) to decide how to average the daily work with the tests for a final grade.

7) The instructor is available via email to answer questions. We use digital whiteboard files to diagram problems and these can be attached to emails.

ADDITIONAL COSTS

1) The textbook and solution manual are ordered directly by the parent from the TPS Bookstore. They range in price from $140 - $150 (all together) including shipping and handling. You will receive information about ordering as it becomes available and you are confirmed in a class.

2) You will be asked to mail tests to the instructor along with a self-addressed stamped envelope. There are about 15 tests to be mailed in for the course of the year.

3) Geometry is the one course that requires an additional software package. We use Geometer's Sketchpad (a dynamic drawing program). This software is about $45 including shipping and handling. More information will be available as classes are established.

4) Algebra and Geometry require a basic scientific calculator.  Advanced Algebra, FST, PreCalculus, and Calculus also require a Graphing Calculator. The TI-83, or TI-84 are the ones that we will be able to tech support in class. This is the calculator allowed for the SAT and ACT so you will gain experience for standardized tests.

PREREQUISITES and PLACEMENT

1) Transition Math - Permission of Instructor and a B+ average or better in Saxon 7/6 or equivalent course.    
Questions? Contact Lori Martin at MrsMartin@pottersschool.org or
                        Contact Rachel Arney at MrsArney@pottersschool.org

2) Algebra - Permission of Instructor or a B or better in UCSMP Transition Math. 
Questions? Contact Lisa Crosby at: MrsCrosby@pottersschool.org or
                        Contact Samuel Gray at MrGray@pottersschool.org

3) Geometry - Permission of Instructor or a B or better in UCSMP Algebra. 
Questions?    Contact Vernice Koemmpel at  MrsK@pottersschool.org  or
                        Lisa Crosby at
MrsCrosby@pottersschool.org

4) Advanced Algebra - Permission of Instructor or a B or better in UCSMP Geometry.
Questions?    Contact Vernice Koemmpel at  MrsK@pottersschool.org

 5) FST - Functions, Statistics, and Trigonometry - Permission of Instructor or a B or better in UCSMP Advanced Algebra.
 Questions?   Contact Lisa Crosby at: MrsCrosby@pottersschool.org or
                        Contact Lori Martin at MrsMartin@pottersschool.org

6) PDM - Probability and Discrete Mathematics - PreCalculus - Permission of Instructor or a B or better in UCSMP FST. 
Questions? Contact Lori Martin at MrsMartin@pottersschool.org

7) Calculus – Permission of Instructor or a B or better in UCSMP PDM. 
Questions?  Contact Lisa Crosby at MrsCrosby@pottersschool.org

 

If this is your first year in the UCSMP curriculum you will need to contact the instructor to find out the correct placement in the series.  Please register for your desired course and have the student take the placement test for the course (linked below).  You will be emailed information from the instructor once your registration is received concerning the evaluation of the placement test and further approval information. This placement test is used as a guideline and does not automatically place a student in a particular class. This test score is one of many factors considered in our goal of placing students in the most appropriate course where they will be prepared for the content and experience success.  If you have further questions please contact the instructor for the course.

Transition Math Placement Test

Algebra Placement Test

Geometry Placement Test

Advanced Algebra Placement Test

Functions, Statistics, and Trigonometry Placement Test

Thank you for your interest in Potter's School. Please let us know how we can be of service to you.

Schedule 2008-2009  (Section number precedes the name of the class)

 

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

8:00 – 9:30

1 – Algebra

2 – PDM (Precalculus)

4 – Geometry

3 – FST

2 – Transition

 

3 – Transition

6 – Algebra

9:45 – 11:15

2 – Algebra

 

1 – FST

1 – Geometry

1 – Transition

5 – Geometry

3– Adv Alg

 

 

11:30 – 1:00

1 – Calculus

 

2 – Geometry

1 – Adv Alg

4– Adv Alg

 

4 – Algebra

 

 

1:15 – 2:45

 

3 – Geometry

2– Adv Alg

6 – Geometry

5– Adv Alg

5 – Algebra

 

 

3:00 – 4:30

3 – Algebra

1 – PDM (Precalculus)

2 – FST

4 – Transition

 

7 – Geometry

 

 

 

4:45 – 6:15

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why (UCSMP)?

Saxon is a fine program for the grammar (elementary) years where math facts and drills are most helpful. However, in our opinion, the "brute force" drill-centered approach which makes it a strong choice for elementary application makes it less desirable in the dialectic and rhetoric (secondary) years where concepts and abstractions become prevalent. To be more specific, here are the weaknesses perceived in Saxon that have lead us to adopt the UCSMP ("Chicago Math") series for our secondary math tutorials (we would like to thank Janna Gilbert for the following 4 point evaluation):

1     Saxon uses a formulaic approach with little emphasis on teaching the students to think their way through a problem. Saxon gives students a rote method of solution, then drills them until they know that method. But experience shows Saxon students often stumble when a similar problem is posed in an unfamiliar form because they don't really understand the reasons behind the method they've been taught. The UCSMP approach, in contrast, stresses first understanding a class of problems and then examines various methods of solution. In short, it encourages the students to think and understand what they're doing.
2     Saxon offers little real-life application of concepts. The "So what?" question is never asked and the student is given no reason to learn the material. Failing to make math relevant is like teaching a student to read words without introducing them to books. The UCSMP series, on the other hand, does a commendable job of applying math to situations which are of interest to the student.
3     For many students the brute force "drill and kill" approach is demotivating. It is also time-consuming, considering the length of the average Saxon problem set. In the UCSMP approach, though a student must initially exert more effort to understand a particular concept, the rewards are tangible: similar-but-not-identical problems are easy vice bewildering, less effort is required master new related concepts , and less subsequent review is required because memorization was not the primary learning tool.
4     We find the organization of Saxon's material to be suboptimal. Conceptual math, like most subjects, is a series of interrelated topics. Learning is enhanced when students understand the relationships between the various parts. Saxon presents each topic essentially in isolation from previous ones with little regard for the order of presentation. UCSMP endeavors to build new concepts from past ones, enhancing understanding acquired in earlier chapters.

To summarize, we believe the Saxon approach is not ideal for secondary math courses. It builds few critical thinking skills and provides little foundation for future application; for some it is confusing and demotivating. In our view it does not optimize preparation for college entrance exams such as the SATs, which is probably its primary goal. Even for a liberal arts student we consider a more conceptual approach to basic secondary mathematics to be the superior alternative. In fact, the traditional classical education included Algebra and Geometry among the core subjects.